Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan Human Rights Record Draws International
Criticism
Todd Diamond
In April 2001, the Uzbekistan Government reported to the United Nations
Human Rights Committee (HRC) that it has established a system of national human rights
institutions and passed more than 100 laws and normative acts dealing with human rights.
While acknowledging the fact that Uzbekistan has been progressing toward democracy in
theory, the Commission questioned the degree to which these laws and institutions are
respected in practice.
Uzbekistan has a pre-established reputation for failing to enforce its
human rights laws. In March of 2000, the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
(CSCE), a U.S. Government agency, concluded that Uzbekistan’s human rights advancements
were purely theoretical. "There has been no liberalization of society nor any
convincing evidence of serious intentions in that direction," read an introductory
statement in the CSCE report.
During its annual New York meeting period, from March 19 to April 6,
the HRC heard reports from Uzbekistan and four other countries, all part of the 148
signatory countries that are required to submit five year compliance updates to the
International Convention on Civil and Political Rights. The HRC also meets in the summer
and fall each year in Geneva.
Uzbekistan reported that it has set up a host of human rights
institutions in an effort to comply with the Convention’s international standards,
including the Office of the Ombudsman (Commissioner for Human Rights of the Oliy Majlis),
the National Center for Human Rights of the Republic of Uzbekistan, and the Institute for
Monitoring Current Legislation. According to this report, the NGOs in place to monitor
human rights in Uzbekistan include the Center for the Study of Public Opinion, the
Committee for the Protection of the Rights of the Individual, and various professional
associations of judges and lawyers.
"Experience in the development of democracy in Uzbekistan has
shown that human rights is (sic) a psychological value of the Uzbek people and an integral
part of the national understanding of peace," read a statement in the country’s
official report. "Independence has shaped society’s need for the development of
human rights, as reflected in the population’s growing social activity."
In its response, the HRC commended Uzbekistan for its effort to bring
its legislation "into harmony with its international obligations." However, it
also "deplored" Uzbekistan’s refusal to reveal how many people have been
executed or condemned to death, and added that it was "gravely concerned about
consistent allegations of widespread torture by law enforcement officials."
The HRC’s concerns were echoed by Human Rights Watch (HRW), which
conducts its own field research in the country. Cassandra Cavanaugh, an HRW senior
researcher for Europe and Central Asia, noted that, at several points, the Uzbekistan
report "states ‘this is the law.’ But it doesn’t go further to say whether the
law is being enforced."
Evidence presented by the HRW this January supported doubt that
Uzbekistan is enforcing its human rights laws. HRW told the Geneva-based HRC that it had
documented evidence of the torture inflicted upon hundreds of Muslims in police custody in
Uzbekistan.
"Police torture is a standard feature of Uzbekistan’s criminal
justice system; those arrested in the crackdown have been tortured by police or security
agents to coerce confessions or to incriminate those with whom they have prayed or studied
Koran," reported HRW in an official statement. "In the past two years alone, at
least fifteen people have died in custody due to torture."
Among its recommendations, the HRC cited the need for Uzbekistan to
guarantee an independent judiciary and to ensure that women get protection from domestic
violence. The HRC also specifically referred to more than 1,300 Tajiks, citizens of
Uzbekistan, who were resettled from their villages in the mountains to the steppes of the
Sherabad region, and called for an end to the expulsion of people from their homes.
"EurasiaNet", 15 May 2001
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/rights/articles/eav051501.shtml
|